THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
|
Orders Pronounced March 18, 2022
|
|
ORDERS ON CAUSES
|
20-0273
|
CADENCE BANK, N.A. v. ROY J. ELIZONDO III AND ROY J. ELIZONDO III, PLLC; from Harris County; 1st Court of Appeals District (01-17-00886-CV, 606 SW3d 802, 03-10-20)
|
|
The Court reverses the court of appeals' judgment and remands the case to the trial court.
Chief Justice Hecht delivered the opinion of the Court.
|
20-0369
|
SANDRIDGE ENERGY, INC. v. JOHN BARFIELD AND TANA BARFIELD, WIFE, INDIVIDUALLY, AND JOHN BARFIELD AND TANA BARFIELD AS NEXT FRIENDS OF C.B. AND K.B., MINOR CHILDREN; from Andrews County; 8th Court of Appeals District (08-17-00059-CV, 630 SW3d 109, 03-27-20)
|
|
The Court reverses the court of appeals' judgment and reinstates the trial court's judgment.
Justice Bland delivered the opinion of the Court.
|
|
(Justice Lehrmann not participating)
|
20-0782
|
BABY DOLLS TOPLESS SALOONS, INC., BURCH MANAGEMENT COMPANY, INC., BDS RESTAURANT, INC., AND TTNA, INC. v. GILBERT SOTERO, AS THE REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF STEPHANIE SOTERO HERNANDEZ, EDUVIGES CHAPA III AS NEXT FRIEND OF A.C.C., A MINOR, AND IVAN HERNANDEZ, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF STEPHANIE SOTERO HERNANDEZ, DECEASED; from Dallas County; 5th Court of Appeals District (05-19-01443-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 08-21-20)
|
|
Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 59.1, after granting the petition for review and without hearing oral argument, the Court reverses the court of appeals' judgment and remands the case to the trial court.
Per Curiam Opinion
|
22-0193
|
IN RE LINDA ANTHONY; 3rd Court of Appeals District (03-22-00110-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 03-10-22)
|
|
relator's motion for emergency temporary relief dismissed as moot
|
|
Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.8(c), without hearing oral argument, the Court conditionally grants the writ of mandamus.
Per Curiam Opinion
|
|
(Justice Blacklock not participating)
|
THE FOLLOWING MOTION TO PARTICIPATE IN ORAL ARGUMENT IS GRANTED:
|
21-1088
|
FIRE PROTECTION SERVICE, INCORPORATED v. SURVITEC SURVIVAL PRODUCTS, INCORPORATED (U.S. Fifth Circuit 21-20145)
|
|
motion of amicus curiae to participate in oral argument granted
|
|
Time allotted to argue: 18/18/4 minutes
|
ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
|
THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ARE DENIED:
|
21-1041
|
EDGAR WASHINGTON, FLORENCE HILL, AND CHRISLYN HILL v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY AND CHRYSLER CAPITAL LLC; from Tarrant County; 2nd Court of Appeals District (02-20-00186-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 10-28-21)
|
|
21-1065
|
ANWAR KAZI, ZAMEER SACHEDINA, ROHIT SHARMA, AND WISEMAN INNOVATIONS, LLC. v. MOHAMMAD SOHAIL; from Dallas County; 5th Court of Appeals District (05-20-00789-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 10-28-21)
|
|
22-0040
|
IN THE INTEREST OF A.A.Z., A.A.Z., AND A.A.L., CHILDREN; from Live Oak County; 13th Court of Appeals District (13-21-00161-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 11-10-21)
|
|
22-0042
|
DENIS M. HANLEY v. STATE BAR OF TEXAS; from Hill County
|
|
22-0172
|
IN THE INTEREST OF B.A., B.W., AND B.W., CHILDREN; from Denton County; 2nd Court of Appeals District (02-21-00278-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 01-27-22)
|
MISCELLANEOUS
|
THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS ARE DENIED:
|
21-0893
|
IN RE STEVEN HOTZE, M.D., HON. SID MILLER, GERRY MONROE, RANDOLPH PRICE, ALAN HARTMAN, ALAN VERA, AND GREGORY BLUME; 14th Court of Appeals District (14-21-00541-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 10-11-21)
|
|
Justice Blacklock, joined by Justice Young, delivered an opinion concurring in the denial of the petition for writ of mandamus.
Justice Devine delivered an opinion dissenting to the denial of the petition for writ of mandamus.
|
|
22-0141
|
IN RE KRISTIE SANDS; from Collin County
|
|
as amended motion to amend granted emergency temporary relief denied
|
|
22-0160
|
IN RE CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY; from Maverick County; 4th Court of Appeals District (04-21-00477-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 01-19-22)
|
|
relator's motion for emergency temporary relief denied
|