|
THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
|
|
Orders Pronounced October 22, 2021
|
| |
|
ORDERS ON CAUSES
|
|
20-0789
|
IN RE AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC.; from Dallas County; 5th Court of Appeals District (05-20-00832-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 09-23-20)
|
| |
Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.8(c), without hearing oral argument, the Court conditionally grants the petition for writ of mandamus.
Per Curiam Opinion
|
|
THE MOTION IN THE FOLLOWING CAUSE IS GRANTED:
|
|
20-0079
|
JAMES CONSTRUCTION GROUP, LLC AND PRIMORIS SERVICES CORPORATION v. WESTLAKE CHEMICAL CORPORATION; from Harris County; 14th Court of Appeals District (14-18-00083-CV, 594 SW3d 722, 12-17-20)
|
| |
unopposed motion to dismiss conditional cross-petition for review granted
|
|
ORDERS ON CASES GRANTED
|
|
THE FOLLOWING PETITION FOR REVIEW IS GRANTED:
|
|
20-0762
|
USAA TEXAS LLOYD'S COMPANY AND ALLCAT CLAIMS SERVICE, LP v. JOHN R. GRIFFITH; from Hidalgo County; 13th Court of Appeals District (13-17-00337-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 06-26-19)
|
| |
motion for rehearing granted
denial of petition for review on September 3, 2021, withdrawn
petition reinstated
Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 56.3, without considering the merits, the Court grants the petition for review, vacates the judgments of the court of appeals and the trial court and renders judgment dismissing the petition.
|
|
ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
|
|
THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ARE DENIED:
|
|
21-0517
|
IN RE COMMITMENT OF MICHAEL WAYNE BOHANNAN; from Montgomery County; 9th Court of Appeals District (09-20-00260-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 03-25-21)
|
| |
|
21-0540
|
MYRA LISA WELLONS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS THE REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF JASON WELLONS, DECEASED, MEGAN WELLONS v. VALERO REFINING-NEW ORLEANS, L.L.C.; from Harris County; 14th Court of Appeals District (14-18-01075-CV, 616 SW3d 220, 12-31-20)
|
| |
|
21-0699
|
ROBERT CORLEY v. TIMOTHY CORLEY, JASON CORLEY AND CENTURY OAKS LAND LLC; from Bexar County; 4th Court of Appeals District (04-21-00181-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 06-30-21)
|
| |
|
21-0715
|
VETS SECURING AMERICA, INC. v. EDWARD SMITH; from Nueces County; 13th Court of Appeals District (13-21-00057-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 07-01-21)
|
| |
motion for emergency temporary relief dismissed as moot
|
| |
|
21-0753
|
IN RE A.W., A CHILD; from Tarrant County; 2nd Court of Appeals District (02-21-00058-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 07-29-21)
|
| |
|
21-0758
|
MARY LAVIGNE v. JOHN T. NGUYEN, MD, FACS, FICS; from Fort Bend County; 14th Court of Appeals District (14-20-00185-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 07-06-21)
|
| |
|
21-0773
|
LAFAYETTE NELSON III v. EGYPTIAN MAGIC SKIN CREAM, LLC; from Dallas County; 5th Court of Appeals District (05-20-00106-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 06-17-21)
|
| |
|
21-0804
|
IN RE COMMITMENT OF DAVID DODSON; from Montgomery County; 9th Court of Appeals District (09-19-00228-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 07-15-21)
|
|
THE FOLLOWING PETITION FOR REVIEW IS DISMISSED:
|
|
21-0578
|
TITA SENEE GRAVES v. NAAG PATHOLOGY LABS, PC, DR. EVAN MATSHES, AND DR. SAM ANDREWS; from Lubbock County; 7th Court of Appeals District (07-19-00308-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 05-25-21)
|
| |
motion to dismiss petition for review granted
|
|
ORDERS ON MOTIONS FOR REHEARING
|
|
THE MOTIONS FOR REHEARING OF THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ARE DENIED:
|
|
20-0668
|
LAURA HAMPTON v. EQUITY TRUST COMPANY; from Travis County; 3rd Court of Appeals District (03-19-00401-CV, 607 SW3d 1, 07-23-20)
|
| |
|
20-0813
|
PACIFIC WORLD ENERGY, LTD. v. PIE INVESTMENTS, LLC; from Montgomery County; 9th Court of Appeals District (09-19-00155-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 09-03-20)
|
| |
|
21-0314
|
IN THE INTEREST OF J.P., J.S.P., AND A.P., CHILDREN; from Taylor County; 11th Court of Appeals District (11-20-00209-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 03-09-21)
|
| |
|
21-0349
|
ANTHONY G. BUZBEE, AND THE BUZBEE LAW FIRM v. ROBERTO CANALES, M.D. AND ROBERTO CANALES, M.D. P.A.; from El Paso County; 8th Court of Appeals District (08-20-00138-CV, 621 SW3d 818, 03-09-21)
|
| |
|
21-0387
|
THE CITY CARROLLTON, TEXAS v. WEIR BROTHERS CONTRACTING, LLC; from Dallas County; 5th Court of Appeals District (05-20-00714-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 03-22-21)
|
|
MISCELLANEOUS
|
|
THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS ARE DENIED:
|
|
21-0805
|
IN RE JERRY LIVELY; from Comal County
|
| |
|
21-0806
|
IN RE ALL SAINTS CARE INJURY AND REHABILITATION CLINIC, INC. AND JACKSON C. EHIOGUH; from Dallas County; 5th Court of Appeals District (05-21-00223-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 08-27-21)
|
| |
|
21-0811
|
IN RE PRABHAKAR GOPALAN; from Travis County; 3rd Court of Appeals District (03-21-00209-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 07-15-21)
|
| |
|
21-0885
|
IN RE SOUTHEAST TEXAS VETERINARY CLINICS PLLC; from Jefferson County; 9th Court of Appeals District (09-20-00271-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 03-18-21)
|
| |
relator's emergency motion for stay denied
|
| |
|
21-0904
|
IN RE MOSAIC BAYBROOK ONE LP, MOSAIC BAYBROOK TWO, LP; MOSAIC BAYBROOK ONE GP LLC; MOSAIC BAYBROOK TWO GP LLC; MOSAIC RESIDENTIAL, INC.; ROBERT M. WEBER; VALISSA PARMER; ABID BHIMANI; MOSAIC GP FUND III LLC; EASTHAM CAPITAL FUND III (QP) LP; EASTHAM CAPITAL FUND IV, LP; AUSPAY-BAYBROOK, LLC; AUSPAY-MOSAIC GP, LLC; WILLIAMSBURG ENTERPRISES, LLLP; PHILIP SALEM; WIDAD SALEM; AND BAYBROOK LL, LLC; from Harris County; 14th Court of Appeals District (14-19-00514-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 06-29-21)
|
| |
emergency motion to stay abatement order denied, as amended and supplemented
motion to stay interlocutory appeal of temporary injunction order denied, as supplemented
|
|
A STAY IS ISSUED IN THE FOLLOWING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS:
|
|
21-0886
|
IN RE AUBURN CREEK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, THE LYND COMPANY, LYND FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, AND FORTY FOUR ELEVEN, LLC; from Bexar County; 4th Court of Appeals District (04-21-00389-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 10-06-21)
|
| |
relators' emergency motion for temporary stay granted
stay order issued
|
| |
[Note: The petition for writ of mandamus remains pending before this Court.]
|
|
THE MOTION TO STAY IN THE FOLLOWING CASE IS DENIED:
|
|
20-0928
|
JOSE DOMINGUEZ v. AMERICAN EXPRESS BANK FSB; from Fort Bend County; 14th Court of Appeals District (14-17-00157-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 05-29-20)
|
| |
motion for stay of mandate pending certiorari review denied
|
