|
THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
|
|
Orders Pronounced July 10, 2020
|
| |
|
ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
|
|
THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ARE DENIED:
|
|
20-0151
|
HARRIET NICHOLSON v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. AND COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC. AND DAVID STOCKMAN, DONNA STOCKMAN, AND DENISE BOERNER; from Tarrant County; 2nd Court of Appeals District (02-19-00085-CV & 02-19-00103-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 12-31-19)
|
| |
|
| |
(Justice Boyd and Justice Busby not participating)
|
| |
|
20-0219
|
IN THE INTEREST OF J.J. AND T.J., CHILDREN; from Harris County; 14th Court of Appeals District (14-19-00622-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 01-28-20)
|
| |
|
20-0324
|
KRISHNA FINANCIAL, LTD. v. ELVIS B. FOSTER, P.C.; from Harris County; 14th Court of Appeals District (14-19-00038-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 03-12-20)
|
| |
|
20-0367
|
MICHAEL A. GARZA v. WELL MED MEDICAL MANAGEMENT, INC.; from Nueces County; 13th Court of Appeals District (13-18-00236-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 03-05-20)
|
| |
|
20-0426
|
PRADYUMNA CHARY MUMMADY, M.D. v. ODILIA GALAN, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF FELIPA GALAN, DECEASED, AND ON BEHALF OF ALL WRONGFUL DEATH BENEFICIARIES; 13th Court of Appeals District (13-19-00321-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 04-09-20)
|
| |
|
20-0438
|
IN THE INTEREST OF H.E.W.M., A CHILD; from Kendall County; 4th Court of Appeals District (04-19-00202-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 04-15-20)
|
| |
|
20-0465
|
IN THE INTEREST OF A.C.S.S. AND S.C.S., CHILDREN; from Tarrant County; 2nd Court of Appeals District (02-19-00429-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 04-30-20)
|
| |
|
20-0474
|
IN THE INTEREST OF A.C., K.C., D.K., AND M.K., CHILDREN; from Lubbock County; 7th Court of Appeals District (07-20-00003-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 04-07-20)
|
| |
motion to withdraw as counsel granted
|
| |
|
20-0496
|
IN THE INTEREST OF A.M.M., A CHILD; from Bexar County; 4th Court of Appeals District (04-19-00806-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 05-06-20)
|
|
THE FOLLOWING PETITION FOR REVIEW IS ABATED:
|
|
19-0815
|
FOLOSADE OJO, M.D. v. JAMES MASON, ET AL.; from Galveston County; 1st Court of Appeals District (01-18-00045-CV, 582 SW3d 773, 08-01-19)
|
| |
motion for partial abatement granted
abatement order issued
|
| |
[Note: The petition for review, filed on behalf of Amed-Health, Inc. d/b/a A*Med Community Hospice, is removed from the Court's active docket until October 5, 2020, by which time the parties must file a status report or a motion to dismiss.]
|
| |
(Justice Lehrmann not participating)
|
|
ORDERS ON MOTIONS FOR REHEARING
|
|
THE MOTIONS FOR REHEARING OF THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS FOR REVIEW ARE DENIED:
|
|
20-0245
|
W.C. AND Z.B. v. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY AND PROTECTIVE SERVICES; from Travis County; 3rd Court of Appeals District (03-19-00713-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 03-18-20)
|
| |
|
20-0409
|
IN THE INTEREST OF I.N.D., D.M.R., A.M.R., L.F.R., AND A.R.R., CHILDREN; from Bexar County; 4th Court of Appeals District (04-20-00121-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 05-13-20)
|
|
MISCELLANEOUS
|
|
THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS ARE DENIED:
|
|
20-0449
|
IN RE CELINA JEAN HARP; from Travis County; 14th Court of Appeals District (14-20-00282-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 04-30-20)
|
| |
as redrafted
request for emergency stay denied
|
| |
|
20-0495
|
IN RE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY AND PROTECTIVE SERVICES; from Tarrant County; 2nd Court of Appeals District (02-20-00155-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 06-10-20)
|
|
THE FOLLOWING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED:
|
|
20-0188
|
IN RE CELINA JEAN HARP; from Travis County; 14th Court of Appeals District (14-20-00140-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 03-03-20)
|
| |
stay order issued March 19, 2020, lifted
|
|
THE FOLLOWING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS IS ABATED:
|
|
20-0483
|
IN RE FTS INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL.; from Dallas County; 5th Court of Appeals District (05-20-00189-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 06-08-20)
|
| |
abatement order issued
[Note: Effective July 6, 2020, the case is abated pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 8.2 until further order of this Court and is removed from the Court's active docket, subject to reinstatement upon proper motion. TEX. R. APP. P. 8.3. All motions and other documents pending or filed are abated subject to being reurged in the event the case is reinstated. TEX. R. APP. P. 8.2, 8.3. It is the parties' responsibility to immediately notify this Court once the automatic bankruptcy stay is lifted.]
|
